
Takeaways from the 2024 voting season
For Carmignac, the Annual General Meeting (AGM) season represents an opportunity to make our voice heard through voting. In the interest of transparency, we want to share how we voted at the shareholder meetings of the companies we invest in through our portfolios under management.
Management resolutions : Executive Pay
Executive pay is a headline-grabbing topic every year. Indeed, this year’s extraordinary USD 50 billion package for Tesla’s CEO, Elon Musk, certainly raised some eyebrows! While it’s fair to say this was exceptional, there was no shortage of debates this year.
Our pay-package votes are primarily driven by our assessment of the alignment between executive pay and the long-term performance of the business. In other words, we want to ensure that management is sufficiently incentivised to drive the company forward and held to account over its progress.
We voted against 23% of all remuneration resolutions of our investee companies. This represents an increase compared to 15% last year. The three main reasons were:
- Lack of performance-related metrics. This tends to be a prevalent issue in North America.
- Insufficient performance targets, allowing sizeable reward even in cases of underperformance.
- A box-ticking approach to environmental, social and governance (ESG) factors. Instead, executive pay should be linked to the long-term ESG risks and opportunities that are, or are likely to become, financially material for the company.
Shareholder-led resolutions
The filling of resolutions by shareholders at AGMs is a fundamental tool in ensuring minority shareholders can hold boards accountable.
During the 2024 voting season, we voted on 146 shareholder-led resolutions (109 in 2023) and we supported 64% of them (52% in 2023). While it is challenging to compare year-on-year voting data given the evolution in the composition of our portfolios we observed a notable rise in the number of governance-related shareholder-led resolutions. In 2023, we voted on 50 governance-led resolutions, whereas in 2024, this number increased to 83. Our increased level of support for these resolutions also grew from 50% to 69%, which reflects both the improvement in quality and the important contribution they play to the advancement of minority shareholder rights.
One growing trend is the use of AGMs as a forum for confrontation between anti-ESG proponents and those wishing to hold corporations to account for ‘doing good’, without adequately considering financial materiality of the topic in focus. This is an area of concern given the increasing number of resolutions, on a continuously expanding range of issues, including some of a political nature, risks overshadowing financially material and critical ESG issues.

Given the nuance of these debates, we always take a case-by-case approach to voting on these resolutions. We believe the most appropriate approach is to ensure we only support resolutions which tackle relevant issues, are not overly prescriptive or burdensome, and are genuinely constructive on ESG issues.
Below are some of the significant shareholder-led resolutions we voted on this season. They have received various levels of support1. A significant level of support, above 30%, for a shareholder-led resolution, or 20% against a management-led resolution sends a strong signal to the board that shareholders expect more action on a specific issue. It is sometimes the only means by which minority shareholders can communicate this. This is especially the case in companies with a shareholder that holds a controlling stake.
In-focus topics
What’s next?
We use our vote to signal concerns to the boards of the companies we are invested in but our active ownership activity does not stop here. Through engagement and dialogue with companies, we seek to influence change and complement our voting activity.
For more information on our approach to engagement, please consult our Engagement Policy14.
1The percentage levels of support provided in this document are approximate and have been calculated by Carmignac based on the company's regulatory disclosures.
2Resolution 6 - Report on Generative AI Misinformation and Disinformation Risks, AGM 29 May 2024.
3Resolution 7 - Report on Non-Financial Matters Regarding Sales of Healthier and Less Healthy Foods, AGM 18 April 2024.
4Resolution 5 - Adopt GHG Emissions Reduction Targets Associated with Lending and Investment Activities, AGM 2 May 2024.
5Resolution 8 - Disclose a Biodiversity Impact and Dependency Assessment, AGM 16 May 2024.
6Resolution 4 - Require Independent Board Chair, AGM 17 May 2024.
7Now GE Aerospace. Resolution 4 - Require Independent Board Chair, AGM 7 May 2024.
8Resolution 4 - Require Independent Board Chair, AGM 10 May 2024.
9Resolution 4 - Require Independent Board Chair, AGM 2 May 2024.
10Resolution 5 - Approve Recapitalization Plan for all Stock to Have One-vote per Share, AGM 29 May 2024.
11Resolution 9 - Approve Recapitalization Plan for all Stock to Have One-vote per Share, AGM 7 June 2024.
12Source: company proxy statement.
13Resolution 12 - Commission Third Party Assessment on Company's Commitment to Freedom of Association and Collective Bargaining and resolution 17 - Commission a Third Party Audit on Working Conditions, AGM 22 May 2024.

